#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Artemisa	5	3	2	40:30	0.600
2.	Industriales	5	3	2	29:27	0.600
3.	Matanzas	5	3	2	26:27	0.600
4.	Holguin	5	2	3	31:32	0.400
5.	Mayabeque	5	2	3	30:40	0.400
6.	Las Tunas	5	1	4	16:25	0.200

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Industriales	10	7	3	65:47	0.700
2.	Holguin	10	6	4	70:48	0.600
3.	Las Tunas	10	6	4	69:53	0.600
4.	Artemisa	10	4	6	74:77	0.400
5.	Mayabeque	10	4	6	56:74	0.400
6.	Matanzas	10	3	7	42:69	0.300

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Industriales	15	11	4	97:72	0.733
2.	Las Tunas	15	8	7	110:81	0.533
3.	Holguin	15	7	8	101:99	0.467
4.	Mayabeque	15	7	8	102:108	0.467
5.	Matanzas	15	6	9	79:98	0.400
6.	Artemisa	15	6	9	97:124	0.400

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Las Tunas	20	12	8	136:104	0.600
2.	Industriales	20	12	8	121:102	0.600
3.	Holguin	20	11	9	143:131	0.550
4.	Mayabeque	20	11	9	132:134	0.550
5.	Matanzas	20	8	12	109:128	0.400
6.	Artemisa	20	7	13	130:166	0.350

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Industriales	25	17	8	164:121	0.680
2.	Las Tunas	25	14	11	170:137	0.560
3.	Mayabeque	25	13	12	152:159	0.520
4.	Holguin	25	12	13	159:163	0.480
5.	Artemisa	25	9	16	155:198	0.360
6.	Matanzas	25	8	17	125:180	0.320

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH

#	Team	MP	W	L	R	PCT	Form
1.	Industriales	30	20	10	184:140	0.667
2.	Las Tunas	30	17	13	206:162	0.567
3.	Holguin	30	16	14	202:183	0.533
4.	Mayabeque	30	14	16	184:196	0.467
5.	Matanzas	29	12	17	161:205	0.414
6.	Artemisa	30	12	18	184:213	0.400

TRANS_STANDINGS_RANK_SETUP_H2H_MATCH